mysterium Trinitatis is not sufficiently manifest in the O. T. to warrant this interpretation. II. Tuch and others account for the plural on the ground that in a case of reflection or self-consultation, the subject stands as the object, in antithesis to itself, the speaker conceiving himself as addressing himself; cf. Del. on Is. 6:8; Tuch, Comm., 2nd ed., p. 23. But as Del. and Di. point out, there is no proof of the existence of such a plural. III. Kn. and others explain the plural from the custom
Page 14